In
an article recently printed in a pro-Kremlin newspaper, Andranik
Migranyan, head of a pro-Russian organization here in Manhattan,
suggested that had Hitler stopped in 1939 he would be considered a “good
Hitler”. “One should distinguish the difference Hitler before 1939 and
Hitler after 1939” said Mr. Migranyan who argues that if Hitler had
stopped after the “bloodless” reunification of German lands “he would
have gone down in the history of his country as a politician of the
highest order”.
How
Mr. Migranyan could make such a statement despite the fact that by this
time Hitler had already organized Dachau (the first concentration
camp), Kristallnacht, and carried out dozens of Nuremberg racial laws,
is beyond me. My own grandfather, Max Schoenwalter who lived with his
family in Germany received a letter from the Nazi Government informing
him that his paint company was to be liquidated and Judenrein or “Jew free”. That letter was sent to him in January of 1938.
But
an even deeper question arises: Why would a Russian, representing the
current Russian government make such a statement? The Soviet Union lost
more than 20 million people fighting the Germans during the Second World
War. Communists despise Fascists. How could Migranyan say this?
The
reality is that until Germany attacked Russia, the Soviets were largely
unaffected by what the Nazis were doing to Jews and other groups they
deemed non-Aryan. It wasn’t until the Nazis invaded Russia that the
Soviet Union was impacted by Fascism. And so liquidating people’s
businesses, implementing discriminatory laws, instigating pogroms and
sending Jews to concentration camps dosen’t make Hitler a bad person.
Only attacking Russia does.
No comments:
Post a Comment